
On the question of climate change
November 12, 2007Researchers all over the world are united in their conclusions – with some, very few exceptions. We are heading towards a gigantic disaster if we do not change our way of living. We have a choice – either to go on as nothing has happened or take immediate forceful actions to stop and turn the development, where the enormous productions of energy sources create gigatons of carbon dioxide in the samt time as we cut down our rainforests and most of all other important green savers. Daring and courageous politicians and other leaders ought to make definite decisions to turn all of us to enter new courses, changing our attitudes and behaviours. But this is quite easy to say and almost hopless to do. Just imagine this scenario: From January 1, 2008 it will become strictly forbidden to drive any gasoline private car within all cities where the inhabitants are more than 100 000 people. Only electrical cars will be allowed for private driving within the cities.
I am afraid that such a decision would cause lots of angry demonstrations and lots of counter attacks of different kinds. The problem is that the majority of people will not accept any steps at all that will radically hamper their way of living. Why? Well, I am quite pessimistic about how far and how well the majority looks at everything that is going on around them. I am afraid that most Swedes, just as an example, nod when they listen to or read about the climate threat, and people probably tell their friends that this is really a serious matter, and then they look out through the windows, and all they see is the November darkness, and all they feel is that it is chilly outside, hopeless weather conditions, and then they are starting to long for a climate change that hopefully could bring some warmth. And that is that. And that is the end of the story. Sad to say.
Oh, no! Can’t you give at least some potential possibilities of change ahead? Do you as a psychologist have any examples of when people rapidly have been able (intentionally or unintentionally) to change habits? Decline of religion in Sweden – has that been rapid? Sudden rise of some religions somewhere else?
I am struggling with finding examples but would be good?
If we look at historical examples on the issue of rapid changes I have regretfully to state that the only human actions I can find are those that we call revolutions. This means that people make a mutiny, throwing the men (or women) in power overboard, trying to create a new ideology, a new system, a new kind of leadership, new norms and so forth. But this is not easy. There are many not so very good examples. French revolution. Russian revolution in 1917. Cuban revolution (Castro). But what we also could learn from History is that men and women in power are very slow in their actions to really change things to the better, particularly if they have to oppose those that control the money, the cash flows etc..